Ian Barrow
Impact in
-
- History of Science and Natural History
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
-
- History of Colonial Brazil
- Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
Papers in
-
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 2
- African history and culture studies 1
-
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography 2
- Co-authors
- Douglas E. Haynes (1 shared paper)Gibran Yusuf (1 shared paper)Oxana K. Pickeral (1 shared paper)Kosh Agarwal (1 shared paper)Cheng Fang (1 shared paper)Alberto Quaglia (1 shared paper)Jonathan Z. Li (1 shared paper)Jiong Zhang (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modern Asian Studies (2 papers)The American Historical Review (1 paper)Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology (1 paper)Neoplasia (1 paper)South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGreeceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ian Barrow
9 papers receiving 54 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- History and Philosophy of Science 15
- Anthropology 18
- History 10
- Theoretical Computer Science 1
- Political Science and International Relations 15
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Barrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Barrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Barrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Barrow. The network helps show where Ian Barrow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Ian Barrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 4 | Surveying and mapping in colonial Sri Lanka : 1800-1900 | 2008 | 6 |
| 5 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 0 |
About Ian Barrow
Ian Barrow is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 66 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (2 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (1 paper), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), African history and culture studies (1 paper) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (15 citations), Anthropology (18 citations), History (10 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation) and Political Science and International Relations (15 citations). Ian Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Greece and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Douglas E. Haynes, Gibran Yusuf, Oxana K. Pickeral, Kosh Agarwal, Cheng Fang, Alberto Quaglia, Jonathan Z. Li, Jiong Zhang, Wojciech Makałowski and Vasileios Rafailidis. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Asian Studies, The American Historical Review, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Neoplasia and South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.