I. Repa

33 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

I. Repa
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Animal Science and Zoology 122
  • Equine 9
  • Microbiology 27
  • Small Animals 29
  • Plant Science 93
Replace L. M. Krista with:
L. M. Krista United States
Murat Boydak Türkiye
Katarzyna Kowalczyk Poland
Eisaburo DEGUCHI Japan
Pavel Anatolyevich Rudenko Russia
Abdullah Başoğlu Türkiye
J.P. Braun France
Joseph Neary United States
YK Kirby United States
I. Repa relative to L. M. Krista United States L. M. Krista's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.5×
L. M. Krista · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Repa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Repa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Repa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Repa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Repa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Repa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Repa. The network helps show where I. Repa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Repa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Repa Line = papers co-authored together I. Repa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200633
2 200232
3 199024
4 201324
5 201224
6 200024
7 200222
8 200118
9 200116
10 201314
11 200414
12 200512
13 200712
14 200311
15 201111
16 201311
17 20017
18 20046
19 20056
20
[Image fusion of different tomographic methods (PET/CT/MRI) effectively contribute to therapy planning].
19975

About I. Repa

I. Repa is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Internal Medicine and Genetics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (8 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (5 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (3 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (122 citations), Equine (9 citations), Microbiology (27 citations), Small Animals (29 citations) and Plant Science (93 citations). I. Repa has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter Alexander Horn, Ferenc Kovács, R. Romvárí, I. Holló, János Tőzsér, Tamás Donkó, Ádám György Tóth, Gábor Bajzik, Eli V. Olsen and András Szabó. Their work appears in journals such as Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, British Poultry Science, Veterinary Pathology, Radiology and Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact