I R. Reader

85 papers receiving 832 citations

Peers

I R. Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Geography, Planning and Development 337
  • Philosophy 219
  • Religious studies 112
  • Cultural Studies 90
  • Sociology and Political Science 388
Replace Ben Seel with:
Ben Seel United Kingdom
Matthew Engelke United Kingdom
Ronald L. Grimes Canada
Laurel Kendall United States
Marina Warner United Kingdom
Edward L. Schieffelin United Kingdom
Jeanne Favret-Saada France
Jeremy Carrette United Kingdom
Amira Mittermaier Canada
Robert Alan Segal United Kingdom
I R. Reader relative to Ben Seel United Kingdom Ben Seel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Ben Seel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I R. Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I R. Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I R. Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I R. Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I R. Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I R. Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I R. Reader. The network helps show where I R. Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside I R. Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I R. Reader Line = papers co-authored together I R. Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993144
2 2007105
3 199186
4 201363
5 199261
6 200057
7
Religious Violence in Contemporary Japan: The Case of Aum Shinriky?
200045
8 200143
9 200041
10 201739
11 201234
12 200224
13 201222
14 201516
15 200015
16 199114
17
A Poisonous Cocktail? Aum Shinrikyo's Path to Violence
199614
18 198712
19 202212
20 199311

About I R. Reader

I R. Reader is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Religious studies, Cultural Studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 104 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (28 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (27 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (26 papers), Study and Philosophy of Religion (20 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (18 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (18 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (16 papers) and Media, Religion, Digital Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (337 citations), Philosophy (219 citations), Religious studies (112 citations), Cultural Studies (90 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (388 citations). I R. Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Tony Walter, George J. Tanabe, Richard Fox Young, Bardwell L. Smith, Robert Jay Lifton, Robert J. Smith, Helen Hardacre, S. Ν. Eisenstadt, J. Christopher Gillam and H. Byron Earhart. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, Journal of Japanese Studies, Japan Forum and Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact