I. Griffiths

478 citations
22 papers · 329 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Equine top 5%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Papers in

I. Griffiths

22 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

I. Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Equine 21
  • Small Animals 71
  • Neurology 62
  • Neurology 85
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 84
Replace G. De Ley with:
G. De Ley Belgium
An Vanhaesebrouck United Kingdom
Stephen T. Simpson United States
Valeria Albanese Italy
Karen L. Kline United States
Cecilia Rohdin Sweden
Michael L. Harrington United States
Gum Gg United States
Ine Cornelis Belgium
David S. Bruyette United States
I. Griffiths relative to G. De Ley Belgium G. De Ley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
G. De Ley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Griffiths. The network helps show where I. Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I. Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together I. Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197349
2 197348
3 198441
4 199232
5 199229
6 198119
7 199319
8
The Key-Gaskell syndrome: the current situation.
198217
9 197215
10 197111
11 198110
12 198510
13 20019
14 19726
15 19874
16 19703
17 20002
18 19801
19 19801
20 19711

About I. Griffiths

I. Griffiths is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Small Animals, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hereditary Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (21 citations), Small Animals (71 citations), Neurology (62 citations), Neurology (85 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (84 citations). I. Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Nash, Nicholas Sharp, E. Kyriakides, David Bennett, S. Carmichael, S. Carmichael, Fiona Howie, Pierre Morell, M. C. McCulloch and Pamela Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Record, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact