I. Griffiths

479 citations
22 papers · 375 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Equine top 5%
    • Veterinary Equine Medical Research
    • Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology

Papers in

I. Griffiths

22 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

I. Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Equine 22
  • Small Animals 68
  • Neurology 54
  • Neurology 87
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 78
Replace G. De Ley with:
G. De Ley Belgium
Stephen T. Simpson United States
Michael L. Harrington United States
Valeria Albanese Italy
Nunez Ea United States
Jennifer King United States
Melissa J. Lewis United States
An Vanhaesebrouck United Kingdom
Valentine Martlé Belgium
Ahmet Candan Durak Türkiye
I. Griffiths relative to G. De Ley Belgium G. De Ley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
G. De Ley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Griffiths. The network helps show where I. Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside I. Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I. Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together I. Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197358
2 197354
3 198447
4 199235
5 199233
6 199321
7 198120
8
The Key-Gaskell syndrome: the current situation.
198218
9 197217
10 198114
11 198513
12 197111
13 200110
14 19876
15 19726
16 19703
17 19872
18 19802
19 20002
20 20001

About I. Griffiths

I. Griffiths is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Small Animals, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 375 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological diseases and metabolism (5 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (3 papers), Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (22 citations), Small Animals (68 citations), Neurology (54 citations), Neurology (87 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (78 citations). I. Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include A. Nash, Nicholas Sharp, E. Kyriakides, S. Carmichael, David Bennett, S. Carmichael, Pierre Morell, Fiona Howie, M. C. McCulloch and G. Gettinby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Small Animal Practice, Veterinary Record, Nuclear Physics B, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact