I Custers

757 citations
24 papers · 507 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

I Custers

23 papers receiving 467 citations

Peers

I Custers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Reproductive Medicine 382
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 152
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 131
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • Health Informatics 1
Replace M. Brandes with:
M. Brandes Netherlands
Alison McTavish United Kingdom
Oybek Rustamov United Kingdom
Sine Berntsen Denmark
M.M.E. van Rumste Netherlands
Meghan B. Smith United States
Helene Westring Hvidman Denmark
Martin Balin United States
G. Grimbizis Greece
János Zádori Hungary
I Custers relative to M. Brandes Netherlands M. Brandes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Brandes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I Custers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I Custers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Custers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Custers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I Custers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Custers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Custers. The network helps show where I Custers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I Custers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I Custers Line = papers co-authored together I Custers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008129
2 200846
3 201139
4 200939
5 200738
6 202037
7 201337
8 201131
9 201119
10 202118
11 201816
12 201314
13 201311
14 20199
15 20145
16 20194
17 20224
18 20163
19 20203
20 20172

About I Custers

I Custers is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 24 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian function and disorders (12 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (382 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (152 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (131 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations) and Health Informatics (1 citation). I Custers has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ben W. Mol, Fulco van der Veen, Madelon van Wely, M.M.E. van Rumste, J.L.H. Evers, Pieternel Steures, Peter G.A. Hompes, Monique H. Mochtar, Carolien A.M. Koks and Frank J. Broekmans. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Human Reproduction Update and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact