H.W. Weber

4.5k citations
267 papers · 3.6k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

H.W. Weber

263 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

H.W. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Condensed Matter Physics 2.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.3k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 902
  • Aerospace Engineering 361
Replace D. Dew‐Hughes with:
D. Dew‐Hughes United Kingdom
Hiroyuki Fujishiro Japan
W. Goldacker Germany
Teruo Izumi Japan
Paul N. Barnes United States
U.P. Trociewitz United States
M.D. Sumption United States
Asger Bech Abrahamsen Denmark
Jacques Noudem France
Sang‐Im Yoo South Korea
H.W. Weber relative to D. Dew‐Hughes United Kingdom D. Dew‐Hughes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
D. Dew‐Hughes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.W. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.W. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.W. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.W. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.W. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.W. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.W. Weber. The network helps show where H.W. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.W. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.W. Weber Line = papers co-authored together H.W. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 267 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987259
2 2003117
3 200296
4 199471
5 199066
6 199562
7 200357
8 201454
9 200853
10 197753
11 200345
12 200243
13 199341
14 201138
15 201437
16 200236
17 201036
18 200334
19 199133
20 199033

About H.W. Weber

H.W. Weber is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 267 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (108 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (71 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (50 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (29 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (25 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (25 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (25 papers) and Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (2.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (902 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (361 citations). H.W. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include M. Eisterer, K. Humer, Martin Zehetmayer, В. В. Марченков, R. Prokopec, R. Maix, H. Fillunger, F.M. Sauerzopf, J. Z. Liu and E. K. Tschegg. Their work appears in journals such as Physica C Superconductivity, Superconductor Science and Technology, Cryogenics, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity and Fusion Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact