Hugh O’Connor

1.4k citations
24 papers · 1.1k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Hugh O’Connor

23 papers receiving 999 citations

Peers

Hugh O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 884
  • Reproductive Medicine 383
  • Hematology 36
  • Surgery 84
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 49
Replace Carolien A.M. Koks with:
Carolien A.M. Koks Netherlands
Tarık Aksu Türkiye
Evelien M. Sandberg Netherlands
Haider Jan United Kingdom
Ayman Tammaa Austria
Donald I. Galen United States
Silvia Bramante Italy
R.S. Lucidi United States
Andreas L. Thurkow Netherlands
Mesut Polat Türkiye
Hugh O’Connor relative to Carolien A.M. Koks Netherlands Carolien A.M. Koks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Carolien A.M. Koks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh O’Connor. The network helps show where Hugh O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Hugh O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hugh O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Hugh O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996252
2 1996171
3 1997135
4 1996115
5 199870
6 199767
7 199656
8 199650
9 199429
10 200022
11 199619
12 200017
13 199613
14 199612
15 199612
16 199610
17 19956
18 20045
19 19964
20 19963

About Hugh O’Connor

Hugh O’Connor is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Reproductive Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (13 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (8 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (3 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (2 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (2 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (884 citations), Reproductive Medicine (383 citations), Hematology (36 citations), Surgery (84 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (49 citations). Hugh O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Adam Magos, A. Magos, Fritz Nagele, Robert E. Richardson, Alun H. Davies, Abdulla A.‐B. Badawy, Klim McPherson, Rakesh Sinha, Anthony Davies and Thomas F. Baskett. Their work appears in journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Fertility and Sterility, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact