Hugh Luk
Impact in
- Biophysics top 5%
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
-
- Occupational and environmental lung diseases
- Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
- Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
- Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 1
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 1
- Cell death mechanisms and regulation 1
- Oncology 2
- Cancer Cells and Metastasis 1
- Co-authors
- Lori Kamemoto (2 shared papers)T. Acosta (1 shared paper)Shiv K. Sharma (1 shared paper)A. K. Misra (2 shared papers)Marc T. Goodman (2 shared papers)Shreya Kanodia (1 shared paper)Harvey I. Pass (1 shared paper)Masaki Nasu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (1 paper)Oncotarget (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)Journal of Thoracic Oncology (1 paper)Applied Spectroscopy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Hugh Luk
7 papers receiving 384 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Biophysics 81
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 197
- Analytical Chemistry 57
- Biotechnology 28
- Cancer Research 34
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Luk
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Luk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Luk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Luk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Luk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Luk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Luk. The network helps show where Hugh Luk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hugh Luk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 96 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 4 | Inhibition of apoptosis in colon tumors induced in the rat by 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline. | 1996 | 24 |
| 5 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 2 |
About Hugh Luk
Hugh Luk is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Biophysics, Insect Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 7 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (1 paper), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (1 paper) and Cell death mechanisms and regulation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (81 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (197 citations), Analytical Chemistry (57 citations), Biotechnology (28 citations) and Cancer Research (34 citations). Hugh Luk has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Lori Kamemoto, T. Acosta, Shiv K. Sharma, A. K. Misra, Marc T. Goodman, Shreya Kanodia, Harvey I. Pass, Masaki Nasu, Adi F. Gazdar and Michael J. Becich. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Oncotarget, Cancer Research, Journal of Thoracic Oncology and Applied Spectroscopy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.