Huck‐ju Kwon

1.9k citations
64 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Huck‐ju Kwon

59 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Huck‐ju Kwon
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Public Administration 147
  • Political Science and International Relations 914
  • Development 127
  • Finance 259
  • Sociology and Political Science 622
Replace Bob Deacon with:
Bob Deacon United Kingdom
Ben W. Ansell United Kingdom
Ian Holliday Hong Kong
Isabela Mares United States
Nita Rudra United States
Armin Schäfer Germany
Andrew Glyn United Kingdom
Margaret Weir United States
Daniel Wincott United Kingdom
Peter Burnham United Kingdom
Huck‐ju Kwon relative to Bob Deacon United Kingdom Bob Deacon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Bob Deacon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Huck‐ju Kwon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Huck‐ju Kwon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huck‐ju Kwon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huck‐ju Kwon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Huck‐ju Kwon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huck‐ju Kwon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huck‐ju Kwon. The network helps show where Huck‐ju Kwon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Huck‐ju Kwon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Huck‐ju Kwon Line = papers co-authored together Huck‐ju Kwon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005211
2 1997154
3 200599
4 201482
5
The Welfare State in Korea: The Politics of Legitimation
199981
6 200678
7 199970
8 200958
9 200545
10 200339
11 201139
12 200734
13 200131
14 201529
15 200929
16 200126
17 200925
18 201124
19 200721
20 200717

About Huck‐ju Kwon

Huck‐ju Kwon is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Development, Finance and Information Systems, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (30 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (17 papers), International Development and Aid (10 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers) and Asian Studies and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (147 citations), Political Science and International Relations (914 citations), Development (127 citations), Finance (259 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (622 citations). Huck‐ju Kwon has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eunju Kim, Sarah Cook, Joakim Palme, Stein Ringen, Thandika Mkandawire, Tony Fitzpatrick, Min Gyo Koo, Gillian Pascall, James Midgley and Suyeon Lee. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Welfare, Development and Change, Journal of Social Policy, Social Policy and Administration and Social Policy and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact