Hua-Yan Chen

1.5k citations
126 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Hua-Yan Chen

114 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Hua-Yan Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Insect Science 186
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 282
  • Mechanical Engineering 201
  • Materials Chemistry 239
  • Horticulture 5
Replace Scott A. Payne with:
Scott A. Payne United States
P. Romano Germany
Shiyong Yang China
Thomas C. Pesacreta United States
Lihong Han China
Feng Song China
Mark C. Barnes Australia
Rahul Ramachandran United States
Hua-Yan Chen relative to Scott A. Payne United States Scott A. Payne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9×
Scott A. Payne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hua-Yan Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hua-Yan Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hua-Yan Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hua-Yan Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hua-Yan Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hua-Yan Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hua-Yan Chen. The network helps show where Hua-Yan Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hua-Yan Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hua-Yan Chen Line = papers co-authored together Hua-Yan Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201858
2 202156
3 202052
4 201751
5 201647
6 202043
7 201642
8 202139
9 201936
10 201828
11 202326
12 201925
13 202123
14 201720
15 201820
16 201819
17 202119
18 202219
19 201917
20 201614

About Hua-Yan Chen

Hua-Yan Chen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Genetics, Civil and Structural Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 126 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (37 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (33 papers), Fossil Insects in Amber (27 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (20 papers), Structural Load-Bearing Analysis (11 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (11 papers), Structural Response to Dynamic Loads (9 papers) and Hemiptera Insect Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (186 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (282 citations), Mechanical Engineering (201 citations), Materials Chemistry (239 citations) and Horticulture (5 citations). Hua-Yan Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Xiangguo Zeng, Fang Wang, Xin Yuan Yang, Zaifu Xu, Hong Pang, Zhiyong Ji, Jie Liu, Zhiyuan Guo, Jing Zhang and Fuquan Dang. Their work appears in journals such as ZooKeys, Insects, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Zootaxa and International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact