Hsin‐Chu Chen

58 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Hsin‐Chu Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Condensed Matter Physics 423
  • Numerical Analysis 93
  • Computational Mathematics 10
  • Materials Chemistry 615
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 757
Replace Rodney W. Forcade with:
Rodney W. Forcade United States
Mark R. Pinto United States
G. Hrkac United Kingdom
Manfred E. Schabes United States
Yabin Fan United States
L. Selmi Italy
Terry W. McDaniel United States
J.-G. Zhu United States
R. P. Stanley Switzerland
Y.-C. Chen Taiwan
Hsin‐Chu Chen relative to Rodney W. Forcade United States Rodney W. Forcade's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×18.6×
Rodney W. Forcade · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hsin‐Chu Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hsin‐Chu Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsin‐Chu Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsin‐Chu Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hsin‐Chu Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsin‐Chu Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsin‐Chu Chen. The network helps show where Hsin‐Chu Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hsin‐Chu Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hsin‐Chu Chen Line = papers co-authored together Hsin‐Chu Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011139
2 1998117
3 2012109
4 201467
5 201158
6 201256
7 201454
8 201251
9 201051
10 201243
11 201241
12 201236
13 200635
14 198930
15 202329
16 201329
17 201329
18 201124
19 201324
20 201323

About Hsin‐Chu Chen

Hsin‐Chu Chen is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Surfaces, Coatings and Films, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (30 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (13 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (11 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (10 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (8 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (8 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (7 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (423 citations), Numerical Analysis (93 citations), Computational Mathematics (10 citations), Materials Chemistry (615 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (757 citations). Hsin‐Chu Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Hao‐Chung Kuo, Chien‐Chung Lin, Min‐Hsiung Shih, Peichen Yu, Kuo-Ju Chen, Hau-Vei Han, Min-An Tsai, Ahmed Sameh, Chi‐Yang Chang and Kuo-Ju Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, Semiconductor Science and Technology and Journal of Display Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact