Hsiao‐Ting Wu

19 papers receiving 606 citations

Peers

Hsiao‐Ting Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 89
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 19
  • Biochemistry 42
  • Pharmacology 59
  • Toxicology 16
Replace Young‐Rak Cho with:
Young‐Rak Cho South Korea
Youn Kyung Choi South Korea
Sensuke Konno United States
Sundas Fayyaz Pakistan
Jin-Mu Yi South Korea
Yi‐Ching Chuang Taiwan
Shakir M. Saud United States
Suresh R. Volate United States
Desanka Výbohová Slovakia
Laddawan Senggunprai Thailand
Hsiao‐Ting Wu relative to Young‐Rak Cho South Korea Young‐Rak Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Young‐Rak Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hsiao‐Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hsiao‐Ting Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hsiao‐Ting Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hsiao‐Ting Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hsiao‐Ting Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hsiao‐Ting Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hsiao‐Ting Wu. The network helps show where Hsiao‐Ting Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hsiao‐Ting Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hsiao‐Ting Wu Line = papers co-authored together Hsiao‐Ting Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201078
2 200978
3 201376
4 201157
5 200945
6 201638
7 200538
8 201136
9 201735
10 200432
11 200927
12 201426
13 201615
14 199715
15 201711
16 20115
17 20232
18 20231
19 20161

About Hsiao‐Ting Wu

Hsiao‐Ting Wu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology, Nephrology, Aquatic Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (2 papers), Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (2 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (2 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (2 papers), Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers) and Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (89 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (19 citations), Biochemistry (42 citations), Pharmacology (59 citations) and Toxicology (16 citations). Hsiao‐Ting Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jong‐Hwei S. Pang, Sheng‐Teng Huang, Rong-Chi Yang, Chen‐Yu Wang, Chao‐Nin Wang, Wen‐Jin Cherng, Ming‐Yow Hung, Ming‐Jui Hung, Cheng‐Chieh Chang and Shyh‐Hsiang Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Phytomedicine, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, The American Journal of Chinese Medicine, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Journal of Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact