Howard Chiang

34 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Howard Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Cultural Studies 65
  • General Psychology 10
  • History 63
  • History and Philosophy of Science 19
  • Gender Studies 36
Replace Stephen Garton with:
Stephen Garton Australia
John Jowett United Kingdom
Kelly Hurley United States
Miguel León‐Portilla Mexico
Susan Carol Rogers United States
Rebecca Earle United Kingdom
Lisa Heldke United States
Dana D. Nelson United States
Carlo Severi France
Graham St John Australia
Howard Chiang relative to Stephen Garton Australia Stephen Garton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Stephen Garton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Howard Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Howard Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howard Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howard Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Howard Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howard Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howard Chiang. The network helps show where Howard Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Howard Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Howard Chiang Line = papers co-authored together Howard Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995161
2 201548
3 201634
4 201027
5 201725
6 201820
7 201019
8 200815
9 201812
10 20089
11 20158
12 20186
13 20096
14 20085
15
Homosexual Behavior in the United States, 1988-2004: Quantitative Empirical Support for the Social Construction Theory of Sexuality
20094
16 20184
17
Double Alterity and the Global Historiography of Sexuality: China, Europe, and the Emergence of Sexuality as a Global Possibility
20094
18 20203
19 20143
20 20083

About Howard Chiang

Howard Chiang is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Cultural Studies, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (11 papers), Japanese History and Culture (11 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (10 papers), History of Science and Medicine (8 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (7 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (5 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (5 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (65 citations), General Psychology (10 citations), History (63 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations) and Gender Studies (36 citations). Howard Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Abhaya M. Dandekar, Helen Hok‐Sze Leung, Marcia Ochoa, Jack Halberstam, Zeb Tortorici, C. Riley Snorton and Evren Savcı. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly, Culture, theory and critique, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences and History of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact