How Ming Lee

2.5k citations
51 papers · 2.2k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

How Ming Lee

49 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

How Ming Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Catalysis 471
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 1.2k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 65
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 906
Replace Baldur Eliasson with:
Baldur Eliasson Switzerland
Frank Holzer Germany
Bing Sun China
Muhammad Arif Malik United States
Shiyan Li China
R. Gary Grim United States
H.‐R. Paur Germany
Jiayu Huang China
Hao Yuan China
Bo Yang China
How Ming Lee relative to Baldur Eliasson Switzerland Baldur Eliasson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Baldur Eliasson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by How Ming Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of How Ming Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by How Ming Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites How Ming Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by How Ming Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by How Ming Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by How Ming Lee. The network helps show where How Ming Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside How Ming Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with How Ming Lee Line = papers co-authored together How Ming Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009366
2 2008353
3 2008169
4 2005154
5 2012105
6 200486
7 200381
8 200375
9 201473
10 200464
11 200857
12 200156
13 200654
14 201547
15 197835
16 200933
17 197930
18 200829
19 200927
20 201526

About How Ming Lee

How Ming Lee is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Catalysis and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 51 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (27 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (20 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (11 papers), Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation (6 papers), Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics (5 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction (3 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (471 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.2k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (65 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (906 citations). How Ming Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Moo Been Chang, Hsin Liang Chen, Yu-Chen Chao, Sheng Jen Yu, Wei‐Hsin Chen, Rob Jamieson, Ray Kostaschuk, Douglas M. Joy, Ryan Gordon and Moo-Been Chang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy and Nuclear Engineering and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact