Holger Müller

6.6k citations
139 papers · 4.2k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Holger Müller

129 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Holger Müller
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Structural Biology 195
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.7k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.0k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 950
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
Replace Peter Wolf with:
Peter Wolf France
Ronald Holzwarth Germany
Mark A. Kasevich United States
Th. Udem Germany
Hans Dehmelt United States
Scott A. Diddams United States
Dmitry Budker United States
Peter Hannaford Australia
A. Szöke United States
Виталий Л. Гинзбург Russia
Holger Müller relative to Peter Wolf France Peter Wolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Peter Wolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Müller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Müller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Müller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Müller. The network helps show where Holger Müller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Holger Müller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Holger Müller Line = papers co-authored together Holger Müller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 139 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008238
2 2015215
3 2008196
4 2003188
5 2010174
6 2019128
7 2017118
8 2012115
9 2009100
10 1995100
11 200799
12 200998
13 200888
14 201185
15 199981
16 200579
17 201677
18 200175
19 200375
20 201374

About Holger Müller

Holger Müller is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 139 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (41 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (33 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (33 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (23 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (23 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (12 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (11 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (195 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.7k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (950 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations). Holger Müller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Steven Chu, Sven Herrmann, Achim Peters, Sheng‐wey Chiow, Paul Hamilton, Philipp Haslinger, Claus Braxmaier, Brian Estey, S. Schiller and Justin Khoury. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, physica status solidi (b), Physical review. A, Physica B Condensed Matter and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact