Hoi‐Poh Tee

459 citations
11 papers · 290 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
    • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
    • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
    • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
    • Esophageal and GI Pathology

Papers in

Hoi‐Poh Tee

11 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers

Hoi‐Poh Tee
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Gastroenterology 68
  • Surgery 190
  • Pharmacy 19
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 98
  • Hepatology 19
Replace Francisco Callejas-Neto with:
Francisco Callejas-Neto Brazil
Scott R. Ketover United States
Jae J. Kim South Korea
Rehan Haidry United Kingdom
Mel A. Ona United States
Pavel Klvaňa Czechia
Alex M. Sarkisian United States
Harunobu Kawamura Japan
Richard Ricachenevsky Gurski Brazil
Toshiharu Takashima Japan
Hoi‐Poh Tee relative to Francisco Callejas-Neto Brazil Francisco Callejas-Neto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Francisco Callejas-Neto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hoi‐Poh Tee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hoi‐Poh Tee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hoi‐Poh Tee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hoi‐Poh Tee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hoi‐Poh Tee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hoi‐Poh Tee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hoi‐Poh Tee. The network helps show where Hoi‐Poh Tee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Hoi‐Poh Tee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hoi‐Poh Tee Line = papers co-authored together Hoi‐Poh Tee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201381
2 201053
3 201037
4
Pediatric melioidosis in Pahang, Malaysia.
200529
5 201028
6 201226
7 202226
8 20065
9 20092
10 20102
11 20101

About Hoi‐Poh Tee

Hoi‐Poh Tee is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (3 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Liver Disease and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (68 citations), Surgery (190 citations), Pharmacy (19 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (98 citations) and Hepatology (19 citations). Hoi‐Poh Tee has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Arthur J. Kaffes, Suzanne Pearson, Namson S. Lau, John Wlodarczyk, Nicholas R. Fuller, Khean‐Lee Goh, Sanjiv Mahadeva, Wah‐Kheong Chan, Feisul Idzwan Mustapha and Nik Ritza Kosai. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Obesity and British Journal of Hospital Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact