Ho Jen

868 citations
19 papers · 640 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Bone health and osteoporosis research 11
    • Bone and Joint Diseases 3
    • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 3
    • Hip and Femur Fractures 3
    • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 3

Ho Jen

18 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

Ho Jen
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 387
  • Surgery 304
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 93
  • Genetics 128
  • Epidemiology 125
Replace K Faulkner with:
K Faulkner United States
Nazih Shenouda Canada
C.C. Glueer United States
G. Seidl Austria
Benjamin Khoo Australia
K. Weber Germany
Robert Lindsay United States
S. A. Cawte United Kingdom
Winston J. Rennie United Kingdom
Tamon Kabata Japan
Ho Jen relative to K Faulkner United States K Faulkner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
K Faulkner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ho Jen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ho Jen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ho Jen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ho Jen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ho Jen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ho Jen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ho Jen. The network helps show where Ho Jen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ho Jen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ho Jen Line = papers co-authored together Ho Jen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2005137
2 2004101
3 200599
4 200467
5 200557
6 201144
7 200735
8
The accuracy of clinical kyphosis examination for detection of thoracic vertebral fractures: comparison of direct and indirect kyphosis measures.
201127
9 201022
10 200317
11 20159
12 20198
13 20156
14 20164
15 19913
16 19922
17 20251
18 20141
19 20240

About Ho Jen

Ho Jen is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (11 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (3 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Bone and Joint Diseases (3 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (387 citations), Surgery (304 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (93 citations), Genetics (128 citations) and Epidemiology (125 citations). Ho Jen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kerry Siminoski, G Raymond, Brian H. Rowe, Ian Colman, Richard N. Fedorak, Jesse Siffledeen, Sumit R. Majumdar, Neena S. Abraham, Gordon R. Greenberg and David A. Hanley. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osteoporosis International, The Journal of Arthroplasty, American Journal of Roentgenology and The American Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact