H.‐J. Wünsche

2.6k citations
93 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

H.‐J. Wünsche

89 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

H.‐J. Wünsche
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 413
  • Condensed Matter Physics 265
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.2k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 485
Replace Martina Hentschel with:
Martina Hentschel Germany
T. Ackemann Germany
Kathy Lüdge Germany
Oleg M. Yevtushenko Germany
L. Le Gratiet France
P. L. Ramazza Italy
S. Ducci France
J. L. Jewell United States
J. B. Héroux United States
Eyal Buks Israel
H.‐J. Wünsche relative to Martina Hentschel Germany Martina Hentschel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Martina Hentschel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐J. Wünsche

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐J. Wünsche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐J. Wünsche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐J. Wünsche more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐J. Wünsche

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐J. Wünsche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐J. Wünsche. The network helps show where H.‐J. Wünsche may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐J. Wünsche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐J. Wünsche Line = papers co-authored together H.‐J. Wünsche links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005137
2 2005104
3 1996100
4 200096
5 200187
6 199985
7 200483
8 199781
9 199879
10 200676
11 200164
12 200446
13 199744
14 200343
15 199342
16 200640
17 199339
18 199839
19 199838
20 200836

About H.‐J. Wünsche

H.‐J. Wünsche is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Materials Chemistry and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (38 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (37 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (27 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (21 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (14 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (13 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers) and Optical Network Technologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (413 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (265 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.2k citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (485 citations). H.‐J. Wünsche has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include F. Henneberger, H. Wenzel, Uwe Bandelow, Mindaugas Radziunas, O. Brox, B. Sartorius, Siegfried Bauer, J. Puls, O. Brandt and Joachim Rehberg. Their work appears in journals such as physica status solidi (b), IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Crystal Growth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact