Hillary Protas

2.1k citations
29 papers · 1.1k · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Hillary Protas

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Hillary Protas
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 514
  • Physiology 597
  • Neurology 139
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 250
  • Biological Psychiatry 31
Replace Pradeep Thiyyagura with:
Pradeep Thiyyagura United States
Gabriela Spulber Sweden
Lucrezia Hausner Germany
Philip S.J. Weston United Kingdom
Rachel L. Mistur United States
Hanne Struyfs Belgium
Suh Lee United States
Jitka Sojkova United States
Alexandra Roche United States
Gregory M. Preboske United States
Hillary Protas relative to Pradeep Thiyyagura United States Pradeep Thiyyagura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Pradeep Thiyyagura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hillary Protas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hillary Protas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hillary Protas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hillary Protas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hillary Protas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hillary Protas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hillary Protas. The network helps show where Hillary Protas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hillary Protas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hillary Protas Line = papers co-authored together Hillary Protas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013190
2 2012159
3 2012118
4 2015113
5 2011103
6 200885
7 200458
8 201552
9 202325
10 202121
11 201221
12 201921
13 200920
14 201719
15 202316
16 202112
17 200511
18 201210
19 20045
20 20065

About Hillary Protas

Hillary Protas is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (13 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (514 citations), Physiology (597 citations), Neurology (139 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (31 citations). Hillary Protas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric M. Reiman, Kewei Chen, Adam Fleisher, Paul M. Thompson, Pradeep Thiyyagura, Richard J. Caselli, Wendy Lee, Xiaofen Liu, Daniel Bandy and Jessica B. Langbaum. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neurobiology of Aging, NeuroImage, JAMA Neurology and International Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact