H.F. Monteiro

709 citations
40 papers · 486 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

H.F. Monteiro

39 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

H.F. Monteiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 375
  • Animal Science and Zoology 67
  • Small Animals 38
  • Nephrology 23
  • Genetics 86
Replace Shoukun Ji with:
Shoukun Ji China
Greg B Penner Canada
Ezequias Castillo‐Lopez Austria
Shirley Motta de Souza Brazil
Thomer Durman Brazil
J.T. Sylvester United States
S. Ramos South Korea
Jiachuhan Wang China
C. Ataşoğlu Türkiye
G. R. Ghorbani Iran
H.F. Monteiro relative to Shoukun Ji China Shoukun Ji's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Shoukun Ji · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.F. Monteiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.F. Monteiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.F. Monteiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.F. Monteiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.F. Monteiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.F. Monteiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.F. Monteiro. The network helps show where H.F. Monteiro may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.F. Monteiro, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.F. Monteiro Line = papers co-authored together H.F. Monteiro links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202078
2 202251
3 201745
4 201524
5 201821
6 202220
7 201819
8 202118
9 201915
10 202215
11 202315
12 201614
13 202313
14 202213
15 202112
16 202010
17 20239
18 20219
19 20228
20 20208

About H.F. Monteiro

H.F. Monteiro is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Plant Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (31 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (13 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (4 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Animal health and immunology (3 papers) and Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (375 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (67 citations), Small Animals (38 citations), Nephrology (23 citations) and Genetics (86 citations). H.F. Monteiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Costa Rica. Frequent co-authors include A.P. Faciola, Eduardo Marostegan de Paula, Lorrayny Galoro da Silva, F.S. Lima, Xiaoxia Dai, Bart C. Weimer, G.A. Broderick, Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti, Igor F. Canisso and Simon R. Poulson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Scientific Reports, Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact