Hermann Schier

813 citations
17 papers · 566 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Hermann Schier

16 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Hermann Schier
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 319
  • History and Philosophy of Science 49
  • Information Systems and Management 49
  • Information Systems 104
  • Computer Science Applications 20
Replace Vincent Larivière with:
Vincent Larivière Canada
Richard D Jones Norway
Nadine Desrochers Canada
Balázs Schlemmer Hungary
Yassine Gargouri Canada
Frederik T. Verleysen Belgium
Truyken L. B. Ossenblok Belgium
Cenyu Shen Finland
Adrián A. Díaz‐Faes Spain
Bikun Chen China
Hermann Schier relative to Vincent Larivière Canada Vincent Larivière's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Vincent Larivière · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hermann Schier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hermann Schier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hermann Schier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hermann Schier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hermann Schier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hermann Schier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hermann Schier. The network helps show where Hermann Schier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Hermann Schier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hermann Schier Line = papers co-authored together Hermann Schier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011196
2 200197
3 200878
4 201657
5 200930
6 201030
7 201023
8 201420
9 19929
10 20118
11 20165
12 20053
13 20103
14
Standards für die Anwendung der Bibliometrie bei der Evaluation von Forschungsinstituten im Bereich der Naturwissenschaften
20123
15 20012
16 19982
17 20140

About Hermann Schier

Hermann Schier is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 17 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (10 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Web visibility and informetrics (3 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Nuclear materials and radiation effects (1 paper), Academic Publishing and Open Access (1 paper) and Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (319 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (49 citations), Information Systems and Management (49 citations), Information Systems (104 citations) and Computer Science Applications (20 citations). Hermann Schier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Werner Marx, Lutz Bornmann, Hans‐Dieter Daniel, Andreas Thor, Erhard Rahm, Robin Haunschild, M. Schreck, A. Lehmann, Michaël Abraham and Wolfgang Göpel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Research Evaluation and Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact