Herbert Sonthoff
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Philosophy and Historical Thought
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
-
- Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 1
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1
- War, Ethics, and Justification 1
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
-
- German Literature and Culture Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Martín Heidegger (1 shared paper)Helmut Schelsky (1 shared paper)Alfred L. Weber (1 shared paper)Franz Altheim (1 shared paper)Albert Schweitzer (1 shared paper)Werner Oskar Richter (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Books Abroad (13 papers)The Western Political Quarterly (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Herbert Sonthoff
11 papers receiving 167 citations
Herbert Sonthoff's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Philosophy 130
- History and Philosophy of Science 43
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
- General Psychology 6
- General Social Sciences 14
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Sonthoff
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Sonthoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Sonthoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Sonthoff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Sonthoff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Sonthoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Sonthoff. The network helps show where Herbert Sonthoff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Herbert Sonthoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik Hit paper breakdown → | 1952 | 212 |
| 2 | 1951 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1959 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1954 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1954 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1955 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1951 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1955 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1953 | 0 |
About Herbert Sonthoff
Herbert Sonthoff is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Insect Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (1 paper), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (1 paper), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper), War, Ethics, and Justification (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper), European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies (1 paper), German Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (130 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), General Psychology (6 citations) and General Social Sciences (14 citations). Frequent co-authors include Martín Heidegger, Helmut Schelsky, Alfred L. Weber, Franz Altheim, Albert Schweitzer and Werner Oskar Richter. Their work appears in journals such as Books Abroad and The Western Political Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.