Herbert S. Long

507 citations
16 papers · 218 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 2%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations 1
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 1
    • Byzantine Studies and History 2

Herbert S. Long

13 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Herbert S. Long
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Philosophy 121
  • Anthropology 29
  • History and Philosophy of Science 9
  • Archeology 20
  • Political Science and International Relations 37
Replace Raymond Weil with:
Raymond Weil
Henry Bettenson
Henri de Lubac
Charles M. Young United States
Roland H. Bainton United States
Ralph McInerny United States
R. J. Zwi Werblowsky Israel
Plutarch United States
Sarah Kofman
Kenneth Seeskin United States
Herbert S. Long relative to Raymond Weil Raymond Weil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Raymond Weil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert S. Long

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert S. Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert S. Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert S. Long more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert S. Long

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert S. Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert S. Long. The network helps show where Herbert S. Long may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Herbert S. Long, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herbert S. Long Line = papers co-authored together Herbert S. Long links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1969126
2 196344
3 197417
4 19697
5 19536
6 19644
7 19564
8 19513
9 19552
10 19531
11 19521
12 19711
13 19581
14 19821
15 19680
16 19800

About Herbert S. Long

Herbert S. Long is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, Anthropology, Archeology and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper), Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations (1 paper) and Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (121 citations), Anthropology (29 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations), Archeology (20 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (37 citations). Herbert S. Long has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. F. R. Hardie, Aristotle , Christopher Rowe and Whitney J. Oates. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Ultimate Reality and Meaning and The Classical Weekly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact