Henning Piilgaard

886 citations
9 papers · 414 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Henning Piilgaard

8 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

Henning Piilgaard
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Neurology 84
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 144
  • Neurology 114
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 137
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 100
Replace Artem Shatillo with:
Artem Shatillo Finland
Susanne Fuhr Germany
János Lückl United States
Nuran Akgören Denmark
N. Zarchin Israel
Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira Germany
Mojmír Svoboda Australia
V. I. Koroleva Czechia
Coline L. Lemâle Germany
Jessica L. Seidel United States
Henning Piilgaard relative to Artem Shatillo Finland Artem Shatillo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Artem Shatillo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henning Piilgaard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henning Piilgaard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henning Piilgaard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henning Piilgaard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henning Piilgaard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henning Piilgaard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henning Piilgaard. The network helps show where Henning Piilgaard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Henning Piilgaard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henning Piilgaard Line = papers co-authored together Henning Piilgaard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2009178
2 200983
3 201369
4 200929
5 201121
6 201621
7 201611
8 20042
9 20250

About Henning Piilgaard

Henning Piilgaard is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper) and Sleep and related disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (84 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (144 citations), Neurology (114 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (137 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (100 citations). Henning Piilgaard has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Martin Lauritzen, Brent M. Witgen, K Thomsen, Ara Kocharyan, Édith Hamel, Nikolas Offenhauser, Priscilla Fernandes, Micael Lønstrup, Jonas C. Fordsmann and Claus Mathiesen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, Epilepsia, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact