Heloise Weber

30 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

Heloise Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Development 143
  • Business and International Management 61
  • Finance 113
  • Urban Studies 64
  • Economics and Econometrics 251
Replace Patrick Develtere with:
Patrick Develtere Belgium
Robert Picciotto United Kingdom
Ernest Aryeetey Ghana
Robert Hunter Wade United Kingdom
Jude Lal Fernando United States
Doug Porter Australia
Beverly J. Silver United States
Uchenna Efobi Nigeria
Sarah Bracking United States
Margaret McMillan United States
Heloise Weber relative to Patrick Develtere Belgium Patrick Develtere's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Patrick Develtere · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heloise Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heloise Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heloise Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heloise Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heloise Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heloise Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heloise Weber. The network helps show where Heloise Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Heloise Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heloise Weber Line = papers co-authored together Heloise Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017144
2 2004112
3 2002107
4 202071
5 200437
6 201532
7 200631
8 201822
9 201422
10 200521
11 200720
12 201818
13
The global political economy of microfinance and poverty reduction: locating local 'livelihoods' in political analysis
200618
14 201417
15 201617
16 201816
17 200612
18 201510
19 20108
20 20146

About Heloise Weber

Heloise Weber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 36 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (14 papers), Human Rights and Development (6 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (5 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (3 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (3 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (143 citations), Business and International Management (61 citations), Finance (113 citations), Urban Studies (64 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (251 citations). Heloise Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin Weber, Mark T. Berger, Richard Higgott, Robbie Shilliam, R. B. J. Walker, Brian Sutton‐Smith, Ingrid Harvold Kvangraven, Lorraine Fleming, Carolyn W. Sherif and Morten Bøås. Their work appears in journals such as Globalizations, Third World Quarterly, Review of International Political Economy, Review of International Studies and Australian Journal Of International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact