Helmut Ringl

2k citations
60 papers · 1.6k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Helmut Ringl

58 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Helmut Ringl
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 420
  • Biomedical Engineering 464
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 85
  • Health Informatics 28
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 53
Replace Shingo Iwano with:
Shingo Iwano Japan
Pierre Champsaur France
David M. Hough United States
Michele Anzidei Italy
Derek R. Ney United States
Sabine Weckbach Germany
Francis Papay United States
Yusuhn Kang South Korea
Federico Bruno Italy
Jean‐Denis Laredo France
Helmut Ringl relative to Shingo Iwano Japan Shingo Iwano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Shingo Iwano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Ringl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Ringl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Ringl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Ringl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Ringl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Ringl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Ringl. The network helps show where Helmut Ringl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Ringl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Ringl Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Ringl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996332
2 2012144
3 201293
4 201390
5 199680
6 201578
7 200864
8 201853
9 201947
10 199745
11 201344
12 200942
13 201141
14 201034
15 200633
16 201325
17 200923
18 200721
19 202021
20 201020

About Helmut Ringl

Helmut Ringl is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (8 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (6 papers), Radiology practices and education (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (4 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (4 papers), Facial Trauma and Fracture Management (3 papers), Advanced Data Compression Techniques (3 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (420 citations), Biomedical Engineering (464 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (85 citations), Health Informatics (28 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (53 citations). Helmut Ringl has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Weber, Geoffrey D. Rubin, Alexander Norbash, Sandy A. Napel, Christian Herold, Vincent Argiro, R. Brooke Jeffrey, Michael H. Toepker, Michael D. Dake and Christopher F. Beaulieu. Their work appears in journals such as Radiology, European Radiology, European Journal of Radiology, Modern Rheumatology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact