Helmut Gfrerer

1.3k citations
38 papers · 772 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Helmut Gfrerer

38 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Helmut Gfrerer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Numerical Analysis 393
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 486
  • Mathematical Physics 202
  • Applied Mathematics 140
  • Geometry and Topology 98
Replace Rafael Corrêa with:
Rafael Corrêa Chile
Nguyen Mau Nam United States
Alexander Y. Kruger Australia
V. М. Tikhomirov Russia
Abderrahim Jourani France
Juan Enrique Martínez-Legaz Spain
R. A. Poliquin Canada
Regina S. Burachik Australia
T. Zolezzi Italy
Kazimierz Malanowski Poland
Helmut Gfrerer relative to Rafael Corrêa Chile Rafael Corrêa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Rafael Corrêa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Gfrerer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Gfrerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Gfrerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Gfrerer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Gfrerer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Gfrerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Gfrerer. The network helps show where Helmut Gfrerer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Gfrerer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Gfrerer Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Gfrerer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987121
2 198876
3 201272
4 201165
5 201340
6 201638
7 201536
8 199534
9 201728
10 201625
11 201323
12 198320
13 201519
14 202119
15 201918
16 200616
17 201715
18 198712
19 202110
20 19849

About Helmut Gfrerer

Helmut Gfrerer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, Control and Systems Engineering, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 772 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimization and Variational Analysis (28 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (25 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (7 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (5 papers), Statistical and numerical algorithms (5 papers), Numerical methods in inverse problems (5 papers), Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities (5 papers) and Optimization and Mathematical Programming (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (393 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (486 citations), Mathematical Physics (202 citations), Applied Mathematics (140 citations) and Geometry and Topology (98 citations). Helmut Gfrerer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jiří V. Outrata, Heinz W. Engl, Diethard Klatte, Günther Zäpfel, Jane J. Ye, J. Guddat, Wilfried Bauer, Jan Outrata, Jan Valdman and Alexander Y. Kruger. Their work appears in journals such as Set-Valued and Variational Analysis, SIAM Journal on Optimization, Computational Optimization and Applications, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research and Mathematics of Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact