Hellmut Wilhelm

951 citations
43 papers · 554 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hellmut Wilhelm

31 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Hellmut Wilhelm
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Cultural Studies 109
  • Sociology and Political Science 330
  • Philosophy 81
  • Communication 44
  • Language and Linguistics 63
Replace James Legge with:
James Legge United States
Burton Raffel United States
John F. Szwed United States
Dan Ben‐Amos United States
Mark Slobin United States
Victor Terras United States
Susan Rubín Suleiman United States
Américo Paredes United States
Hazard Adams United States
Betty R. McGraw United States
Hellmut Wilhelm relative to James Legge United States James Legge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
James Legge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hellmut Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hellmut Wilhelm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hellmut Wilhelm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hellmut Wilhelm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hellmut Wilhelm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hellmut Wilhelm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hellmut Wilhelm. The network helps show where Hellmut Wilhelm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Hellmut Wilhelm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hellmut Wilhelm Line = papers co-authored together Hellmut Wilhelm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973168
2 196865
3 197347
4 196341
5 195128
6 196721
7 198020
8 197018
9
Heaven, earth, and man in The book of changes
197717
10 195115
11
Understanding the I Ching: The Wilhelm Lectures on the Book of Changes
199513
12 196513
13 197112
14 197210
15 19709
16 19689
17 19738
18 19637
19 19634
20 19624

About Hellmut Wilhelm

Hellmut Wilhelm is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Religious studies, Language and Linguistics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 43 papers that have together received 554 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (21 papers), Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (109 citations), Sociology and Political Science (330 citations), Philosophy (81 citations), Communication (44 citations) and Language and Linguistics (63 citations). Hellmut Wilhelm has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles A. Moore, James D. Hart, Richard H. Wilhelm, Joseph Needham, Donald John Munro, Burton Watson, John Κ. Fairbank, Kwang-Ching Liu, Roderick MacFarquhar and Tsuyoshi Hasegawa. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, Monumenta Serica, The Journal of Asian Studies, The American Historical Review and The China Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact