Heiner Flöthmann

438 citations
10 papers · 386 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Heiner Flöthmann

10 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Heiner Flöthmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 138
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 320
  • Spectroscopy 101
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 17
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 21
Replace E. I. Dashevskaya with:
E. I. Dashevskaya Israel
Peter S. Dardi United States
Steve Ndengué United States
Michael Stumpf Germany
S. I. Ionov Russia
Maurice Monnerville France
G. A. Bethardy United States
Jong-Chen Nieh United States
Manuel Lara Garrido Spain
Chuanxiu Xu China
Heiner Flöthmann relative to E. I. Dashevskaya Israel E. I. Dashevskaya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
E. I. Dashevskaya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Heiner Flöthmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heiner Flöthmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heiner Flöthmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heiner Flöthmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heiner Flöthmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heiner Flöthmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heiner Flöthmann. The network helps show where Heiner Flöthmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Heiner Flöthmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Heiner Flöthmann Line = papers co-authored together Heiner Flöthmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1996117
2 199755
3 199739
4 199939
5 199738
6 199735
7 199820
8 199918
9 199817
10 19978

About Heiner Flöthmann

Heiner Flöthmann is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Spectroscopy and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 10 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (3 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (1 paper), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (1 paper) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (138 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (320 citations), Spectroscopy (101 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (17 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (21 citations). Heiner Flöthmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Reinhard Schinke, Wolfgang Domcke, Clemens Woywod, Hans‐Martin Keller, PAVEL ROSMUS, Abigail J. Dobbyn, Hans‐Joachim Werner, Cornelia Bauer, Koichi Yamashita and Sergy Yu. Grebenshchikov. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics and Chemical Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact