Hefeng Li

780 citations
29 papers · 571 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Hefeng Li

27 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Hefeng Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Modeling and Simulation 130
  • Numerical Analysis 108
  • Polymers and Plastics 99
  • Mechanical Engineering 129
  • General Materials Science 10
Replace П. А. Кузнецов with:
П. А. Кузнецов Russia
Yanshan Liu China
Yuning Zhang China
Jagadish Kumar India
Ali Reza Mazaheri United States
Zhixin Yang China
Ping Luo Singapore
Xinyu Cui China
Nazish Hoda United States
Hefeng Li relative to П. А. Кузнецов Russia П. А. Кузнецов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×65×
П. А. Кузнецов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hefeng Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hefeng Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hefeng Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hefeng Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hefeng Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hefeng Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hefeng Li. The network helps show where Hefeng Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hefeng Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hefeng Li Line = papers co-authored together Hefeng Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201595
2 202465
3 199347
4 202335
5 202433
6 201732
7 202429
8 202528
9 202423
10 202323
11 199423
12 202121
13 202421
14 202017
15 201711
16 202410
17 202110
18 20229
19 20249
20 20218

About Hefeng Li

Hefeng Li is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Mechanical Engineering, Numerical Analysis, Materials Chemistry and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 29 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Graphene research and applications (4 papers), Fiber-reinforced polymer composites (4 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (3 papers), Mechanical Behavior of Composites (3 papers), Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (3 papers), Electromagnetic wave absorption materials (3 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (2 papers) and Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (130 citations), Numerical Analysis (108 citations), Polymers and Plastics (99 citations), Mechanical Engineering (129 citations) and General Materials Science (10 citations). Hefeng Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Changpin Li, Jianxiong Cao, Xiaolong Jia, Hongbo Geng, Xianhua Huan, Lei Ge, Zu Kang Lei, Kunquan Lu, Zhonghua Wu and Xiaoping Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Composites Part B Engineering, Journal of Materials Science, Small, Advanced Functional Materials and Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact