Hao Jin

1.2k citations
82 papers · 956 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Hao Jin

78 papers receiving 944 citations

Peers

Hao Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Engineering 81
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 674
  • Building and Construction 169
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 102
  • Pollution 85
Replace Qingjun Chen with:
Qingjun Chen China
John B. Kennedy Canada
Chunfa Zhao China
Rongqiao Xu China
A. Romero Spain
M.D. Martínez-Rodrigo Spain
Hongtao Liu China
Mohsen Mohammadi Canada
Yongtao Bai China
Hao Jin relative to Qingjun Chen China Qingjun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Qingjun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hao Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hao Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hao Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao Jin. The network helps show where Hao Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hao Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hao Jin Line = papers co-authored together Hao Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019106
2 201978
3 202147
4 202040
5 202037
6 201835
7 202229
8 201828
9 201927
10 202026
11 202126
12 202223
13 201822
14 202222
15 202021
16 202221
17 202120
18 202120
19 202418
20 202117

About Hao Jin

Hao Jin is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, General Engineering and Building and Construction, having authored 82 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Concrete Corrosion and Durability (17 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (17 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (14 papers), Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research (13 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (12 papers), Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete (11 papers), Smart Materials for Construction (10 papers) and Innovative concrete reinforcement materials (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (81 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (674 citations), Building and Construction (169 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (102 citations) and Pollution (85 citations). Hao Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Binglong Wang, Songye Zhu, Bin Wang, Shunhua Zhou, Shunhua Zhou, Zhihong Wang, Li Zheng, K.F. Chung, Quanmei Gong and Zheng Li. Their work appears in journals such as Construction and Building Materials, Engineering Structures, Structural Concrete, Structures and Journal of Constructional Steel Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact