Hans‐Peter Loock

4.2k citations
114 papers · 3.4k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Hans‐Peter Loock

111 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Hans‐Peter Loock
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Bioengineering 350
  • Spectroscopy 874
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2.0k
  • Analytical Chemistry 139
Replace Tanya L. Myers with:
Tanya L. Myers United States
C. P. G. Vallabhan India
John Chamberlain United Kingdom
Christopher A. Baker United States
Thomas A. Blake United States
Arjan J. G. Mank Netherlands
W. G. Fateley United States
Benson Ross Sundheim United States
H. Malissa Austria
P. Bordewijk Netherlands
Hans‐Peter Loock relative to Tanya L. Myers United States Tanya L. Myers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Tanya L. Myers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Peter Loock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Peter Loock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Peter Loock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Peter Loock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Peter Loock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Peter Loock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Peter Loock. The network helps show where Hans‐Peter Loock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans‐Peter Loock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hans‐Peter Loock Line = papers co-authored together Hans‐Peter Loock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012311
2 2008280
3 2008254
4 2008191
5 2013186
6 2016139
7 2002113
8 2008113
9 201094
10 199889
11 201677
12 200371
13 200359
14 200457
15 199957
16 200854
17 201049
18 201343
19 201640
20 201039

About Hans‐Peter Loock

Hans‐Peter Loock is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Bioengineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Analytical Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 114 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (36 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (33 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (28 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (22 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (16 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (15 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (11 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (350 citations), Spectroscopy (874 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (2.0k citations) and Analytical Chemistry (139 citations). Hans‐Peter Loock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Scott S.-H. Yam, Zhaobing Tian, Peter D. Wentzell, Jack A. Barnes, Gianluca Gagliardi, Richard D. Oleschuk, Sergei Manzhos, John E. Saunders, Zhaoguo Tong and R. Stephen Brown. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Analytical Chemistry, Applied Optics, Optics Express and Applied Physics B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact