Hans Speier

1.9k citations
32 papers · 362 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Hans Speier

27 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Hans Speier
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Political Science and International Relations 162
  • Sociology and Political Science 166
  • Public Administration 13
  • Communication 22
  • General Energy 3
Replace Harold J. Noah with:
Harold J. Noah United States
P. Terrence Hopmann United States
Walter Lippmann
James Fallows France
Avi Shlaim United Kingdom
Emmett H. Buell United States
Douglass Cater
Eugene Burdick United States
Carl von Clausewitz
Christopher Cochrane Canada
Hans Speier relative to Harold J. Noah United States Harold J. Noah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Harold J. Noah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hans Speier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Speier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Speier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Speier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Speier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Speier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Speier. The network helps show where Hans Speier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Hans Speier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hans Speier Line = papers co-authored together Hans Speier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196078
2 199861
3 195950
4 197146
5 198214
6
Social Order and the Risks of War: Papers in Political Sociology
195214
7 198913
8 195810
9
Wit and Politics: An Essay on Power and Laughter
199810
10 19779
11 19878
12 19917
13 19575
14 19585
15 19794
16
Force and folly : essays on foreign affairs and the history of ideas
19693
17 19523
18 19583
19 19773
20 19803

About Hans Speier

Hans Speier is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (6 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (3 papers), German History and Society (2 papers), Education and Military Integration (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (1 paper), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper) and Military and Defense Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (162 citations), Sociology and Political Science (166 citations), Public Administration (13 citations), Communication (22 citations) and General Energy (3 citations). Hans Speier has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Morris Janowitz, Herbert Goldhamer, Geoff Eley, Robert Jackall, Hans A. Schmitt, Leonard Binder, Richard Rosecrance, William B. Scott, W. Phillips Davison and Daniel Lerner. Their work appears in journals such as World Politics, American Sociological Review, American Journal of Sociology, Labour / Le Travail and Political Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact