Hamid Chakeri

838 citations
40 papers · 673 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hamid Chakeri

39 papers receiving 665 citations

Peers

Hamid Chakeri
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 526
  • General Engineering 58
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 609
  • Mechanics of Materials 88
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 39
Replace Hongzhan Cheng with:
Hongzhan Cheng China
Cungang Lin China
Qianwei Xu China
Gordon Tung-Chin Kung Taiwan
Andrea Franza United Kingdom
Yu Diao China
Moorak Son South Korea
Teb Vorster United Kingdom
Yaohong Zhu China
Wenqi Guo China
Hamid Chakeri relative to Hongzhan Cheng China Hongzhan Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Hongzhan Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hamid Chakeri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hamid Chakeri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hamid Chakeri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hamid Chakeri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hamid Chakeri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hamid Chakeri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hamid Chakeri. The network helps show where Hamid Chakeri may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Hamid Chakeri, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hamid Chakeri Line = papers co-authored together Hamid Chakeri links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010148
2 2013122
3 201765
4 201353
5 201250
6 201439
7 201823
8 202116
9 202116
10 201315
11 201812
12 201412
13 202111
14 20189
15 20188
16 20187
17 20237
18 20207
19 20206
20 20226

About Hamid Chakeri

Hamid Chakeri is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Civil and Structural Engineering, Ocean Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Building and Construction, having authored 40 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (24 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (19 papers), Tunneling and Rock Mechanics (18 papers), Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics (13 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (8 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (8 papers), Rock Mechanics and Modeling (5 papers) and Innovative concrete reinforcement materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (526 citations), General Engineering (58 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (609 citations), Mechanics of Materials (88 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (39 citations). Hamid Chakeri has collaborated with scholars based in Iran, Türkiye and France. Frequent co-authors include Bahtiyar Ünver, Yılmaz Özçelik, Rohola Hasanpour, Daniel Almeida Dias, Ákos Török, Sara Rahmati, Farhad Samimi Namin, Mahdi Moosavi, Saeed Akbari and Shokrollah Zare. Their work appears in journals such as Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Heliyon and Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact