Hal Ashton

3.4k citations
43 papers · 2.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Hal Ashton

40 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Hal Ashton
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 2.3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 864
  • Surgery 443
  • Health Informatics 7
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
Replace Jacques Kpodonu with:
Jacques Kpodonu United States
Mark Johan Schuuring Netherlands
Erin E. Austin United States
Francisco Rocha‐Gonçalves Portugal
Zhuokai Li United States
Rebecca H. Maier United Kingdom
Lee Andrew Goeddel United States
Steven Fein United States
Deborah J. Shuman United States
Devon J. Boyne Canada
Hal Ashton relative to Jacques Kpodonu United States Jacques Kpodonu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Jacques Kpodonu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hal Ashton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hal Ashton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hal Ashton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hal Ashton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hal Ashton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hal Ashton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hal Ashton. The network helps show where Hal Ashton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hal Ashton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hal Ashton Line = papers co-authored together Hal Ashton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995375
2 2002257
3 1991231
4 2000229
5 2012225
6 2009223
7 2007163
8 1998150
9 2001116
10 200983
11 200271
12 199359
13 199959
14 200851
15 199443
16 198840
17
Critical closing pressure in human peripheral vascular beds.
196235
18 202334
19 199925
20 200225

About Hal Ashton

Hal Ashton is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Safety Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 43 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (26 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.3k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (864 citations), Surgery (443 citations), Health Informatics (7 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations). Hal Ashton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include R A P Scott, D. Kay, Simon G. Thompson, Nick M Wilson, Neil M Walker, Katerina Vardulaki, Nicholas Day, Lu Gao, Stephen William Duffy and Martin J Buxton. Their work appears in journals such as British journal of surgery, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Journal of Medical Screening, Journal of Vascular Surgery and Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact