Haijun Chi

1.1k citations
64 papers · 908 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Haijun Chi

61 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

Haijun Chi
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Spectroscopy 185
  • Polymers and Plastics 152
  • Organic Chemistry 280
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 159
  • Bioengineering 47
Replace Jing‐Kun Fang with:
Jing‐Kun Fang China
Fengniu Lu China
Huanan Huang China
Yueyuan Mao China
Linlin Yang China
Palas Baran Pati India
Mustafa Tavaslı United Kingdom
Mingdi Yang China
Anushri Rananaware Australia
Elumalai Varathan India
Haijun Chi relative to Jing‐Kun Fang China Jing‐Kun Fang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Jing‐Kun Fang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Haijun Chi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Haijun Chi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haijun Chi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haijun Chi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Haijun Chi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haijun Chi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haijun Chi. The network helps show where Haijun Chi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Haijun Chi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Haijun Chi Line = papers co-authored together Haijun Chi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200792
2 201780
3 201457
4 202053
5 202236
6 200635
7 201232
8 202126
9 202124
10 201723
11 201221
12 201720
13 202020
14 202119
15 201419
16 202118
17 202117
18 201715
19 201915
20 201615

About Haijun Chi

Haijun Chi is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Polymers and Plastics, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 64 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (27 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (21 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (20 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (14 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (9 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (6 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (185 citations), Polymers and Plastics (152 citations), Organic Chemistry (280 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (159 citations) and Bioengineering (47 citations). Haijun Chi has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guoyong Xiao, Zhiqiang Zhang, Zhizhi Hu, Yunhua Lu, Xiao Li, Dong Yan, Dongyu Zhang, Peng Lei, Yue Wang and Ying Liang. Their work appears in journals such as Dyes and Pigments, Optical Materials, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, Synthetic Metals and Organic Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact