H. Wolf

34 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

H. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Applied Psychology 37
  • Clinical Psychology 146
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 66
  • Reproductive Medicine 30
Replace Keiko Nakano with:
Keiko Nakano Japan
Norma Morrison United Kingdom
R. Sinha India
Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang United States
Nina L. Miller United States
Marit Hornberg Solaas Norway
L Beier Germany
H. Gwynne Jones United Kingdom
Ljiljana Kočoska-Maraš Sweden
Eve H. Limbrick‐Oldfield United Kingdom
H. Wolf relative to Keiko Nakano Japan Keiko Nakano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Keiko Nakano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Wolf. The network helps show where H. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together H. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200264
2 199661
3 200137
4 199633
5 199632
6 200229
7 200618
8 200518
9 200918
10 200618
11 201614
12 201614
13 201312
14 200211
15 20038
16
A monoclonal antibody-cobra venom factor conjugate increases the tumor-specific uptake of a 99mTc-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody by a two-step approach.
19958
17 20028
18
Ventilation scintigraphy of the middle ear.
19977
19 19935
20 20185

About H. Wolf

H. Wolf is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Surgery and Applied Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (3 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Applied Psychology (37 citations), Clinical Psychology (146 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (66 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (30 citations). H. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Frank M. Spinath, Kerry L. Jang, W. John Livesley, Philip A. Vernon, Rainer Riemann, Alois Angleitner, E. Henze, Winfried Brenner, K. H. Bohuslavizki and M. Clausen. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Twin Research and Human Genetics, Nuclear Medicine Communications and European Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact