H. W. Hawk

88 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

H. W. Hawk
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 1.2k
  • Reproductive Medicine 656
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 951
  • Equine 40
Replace P.J. Chenoweth with:
P.J. Chenoweth United States
P. L. Senger United States
M. Thibier France
T. J. Robinson Australia
A.T. Peter United States
Th.A.M. Kruip Netherlands
L.A. Guilbault Canada
R. Di Palo Italy
Alejo Menchaca Uruguay
R. Thun Switzerland
H. W. Hawk relative to P.J. Chenoweth United States P.J. Chenoweth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P.J. Chenoweth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. W. Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. W. Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. W. Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. W. Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. W. Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. W. Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. W. Hawk. The network helps show where H. W. Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. W. Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. W. Hawk Line = papers co-authored together H. W. Hawk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989294
2 2005239
3 1983198
4 1987119
5 199487
6 195666
7 199262
8 195560
9 198654
10 197852
11 197349
12 198848
13
Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research. [3] Animal reproduction.
197945
14 197743
15 198840
16 197040
17 197338
18 198737
19 197133
20 195532

About H. W. Hawk

H. W. Hawk is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Animal Science and Zoology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (65 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (34 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (22 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (18 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (9 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (8 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (1.2k citations), Reproductive Medicine (656 citations), Genetics (1.1k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (951 citations) and Equine (40 citations). H. W. Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include R.J. Wall, Lawrence A. Johnson, Bret Cooper, D. J. Bolt, L. E. Casida, C.A. Kiddy, T. Y. Tanabe, V. G. Pursel, J. Ν. Wiltbank and Neil C. Talbot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology, Biology of Reproduction, Journal of Dairy Science and Reproduction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact