H. Scherer

974 citations
54 papers · 636 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

H. Scherer

49 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

H. Scherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 455
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 61
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 414
  • Condensed Matter Physics 76
  • Radiation 34
Replace S. P. Giblin with:
S. P. Giblin United Kingdom
T. J. B. M. Janssen United Kingdom
R.F. Dziuba United States
Vyacheslavs Kashcheyevs Latvia
M. D. Blumenthal United Kingdom
M. Kataoka United Kingdom
Nam Kim South Korea
S. V. Lotkhov Germany
V. Kose Germany
Rodolphe Boudot France
H. Scherer relative to S. P. Giblin United Kingdom S. P. Giblin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
S. P. Giblin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Scherer. The network helps show where H. Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Scherer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Scherer Line = papers co-authored together H. Scherer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201570
2 201656
3 199855
4 200947
5 201545
6 201844
7 199323
8 201923
9 199723
10 201721
11 202221
12 201915
13 199915
14 199514
15 199913
16 200712
17 201811
18 202010
19 19999
20 19978

About H. Scherer

H. Scherer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 54 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (34 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (18 papers), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (17 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (11 papers), Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques (8 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (8 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (8 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (455 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (61 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (414 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (76 citations) and Radiation (34 citations). H. Scherer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D. Drung, Christian Krause, F. J. Ahlers, Martin Götz, Eckart Pesel, J. Niemeyer, A. B. Zorin, V. A. Krupenin, H. W. Schumacher and U. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Applied Physics Letters, Microelectronic Engineering, Review of Scientific Instruments and Semiconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact