H. Peter Jander

474 citations
28 papers · 387 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

H. Peter Jander

28 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

H. Peter Jander
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Surgery 176
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 111
  • Urology 26
  • Gastroenterology 24
  • Genetics 22
Replace Ingolf Joppich with:
Ingolf Joppich Germany
S A Teefey United States
David Presman United States
Frank E. Maddison United States
Z Chudáček Czechia
Konstantinos Ballas Greece
Perry Jf
ROBERT G. BERNSTEIN United States
V. Javier Casillas United States
S Karasick United States
H. Peter Jander relative to Ingolf Joppich Germany Ingolf Joppich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Ingolf Joppich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Peter Jander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Peter Jander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Peter Jander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Peter Jander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Peter Jander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Peter Jander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Peter Jander. The network helps show where H. Peter Jander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside H. Peter Jander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Peter Jander Line = papers co-authored together H. Peter Jander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980115
2 198148
3 197746
4 197732
5 198123
6 198317
7 198114
8 197913
9 198011
10 19809
11
Demonstration of a chemodectoma by perfusion scanning: case report.
19758
12 19767
13 19785
14 19785
15 19764
16 19804
17 19814
18 19773
19 19803
20 19803

About H. Peter Jander

H. Peter Jander is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Hematology, Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments (6 papers), Hemostasis and retained surgical items (4 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers) and Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (176 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (111 citations), Urology (26 citations), Gastroenterology (24 citations) and Genetics (22 citations). H. Peter Jander has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry L. Laws, M. S. Kogutt, Anastasios A. Mihas, Tariq M. Murad, L. Keith Lloyd, Arnold G. Diethelm, Charles D. Russell, Eva V. Dubovsky, James W. Orr and Kenneth D. Hatch. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Roentgenology, Radiology, Gynecologic Oncology, British Journal of Radiology and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact