H. Feitsma

24 papers receiving 884 citations

Peers

H. Feitsma
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Reproductive Medicine 467
  • Small Animals 255
  • Animal Science and Zoology 240
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 239
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 349
Replace Mukesh Bhakat with:
Mukesh Bhakat India
Bart Mateusen Belgium
Ana Paula Gonçalves Mellagi Brazil
J. F. da Fonseca Brazil
A. Karagiannidis Greece
Rafael da Rosa Ulguim Brazil
R. H. F. Hunter Spain
Ravi Dutt India
Joanna Maria Gonçalves Souza‐Fabjan Brazil
A.T. Peter United States
H. Feitsma relative to Mukesh Bhakat India Mukesh Bhakat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mukesh Bhakat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Feitsma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Feitsma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Feitsma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Feitsma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Feitsma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Feitsma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Feitsma. The network helps show where H. Feitsma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Feitsma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Feitsma Line = papers co-authored together H. Feitsma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011167
2 201275
3 201173
4 201170
5 200459
6
Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine.
199356
7 200652
8 201147
9 201347
10 201145
11 201243
12 201138
13 201232
14 201031
15
Artificial insemination in pigs, research and developments in the Netherlands, a review.
200928
16 201224
17 200013
18 201312
19 201111
20 201211

About H. Feitsma

H. Feitsma is a scholar working on Small Animals, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Animal Science and Zoology and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (10 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper) and Ovarian function and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (467 citations), Small Animals (255 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (240 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (239 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (349 citations). H. Feitsma has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and Norway. Frequent co-authors include M. L. W. J. Broekhuijse, B.M. Gadella, Edita Šoštarić, B. Kemp, N.M. Soede, E.A.M. Graat, B. Colenbrander, NM Soede, Renate Hakze‐van der Honing and Liesbeth Jacobs. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Journal of Animal Science, Theriogenology, Animal Reproduction Science and animal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact