H. Ebert

2.5k citations
62 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

H. Ebert

61 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

H. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Condensed Matter Physics 706
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 688
  • Structural Biology 34
  • Radiation 188
Replace Christine Giorgetti with:
Christine Giorgetti France
T. Koide Japan
S. L. Hulbert United States
Stephen P. Collins United Kingdom
W. Wilhelm Germany
M. Landolt Switzerland
Hirohito Fukutani Japan
H. Fujiwara Japan
L. Fritsche Germany
A. Munkholm United States
H. Ebert relative to Christine Giorgetti France Christine Giorgetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Christine Giorgetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Ebert. The network helps show where H. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together H. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015162
2 2011127
3 199499
4 198894
5 198981
6 198978
7 198876
8 199371
9 199657
10 200851
11 202051
12 200851
13 199650
14 200244
15 199141
16 199339
17 199737
18 201132
19 200831
20 200531

About H. Ebert

H. Ebert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Radiation, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (36 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (17 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (13 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (9 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (9 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (9 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (6 papers) and Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (706 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (688 citations), Structural Biology (34 citations) and Radiation (188 citations). H. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include J. Minář, P. Strange, B. L. Györffy, D. Ködderitzsch, Sebastian Wimmer, Joseph M. Braun, Gisela Schütz, A. Vernes, S. Mankovsky and W. M. Temmerman. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Solid State Communications, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact