H. Ebert

2.5k citations
67 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

H. Ebert

66 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

H. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Condensed Matter Physics 804
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 847
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.4k
  • Structural Biology 36
  • Radiation 210
Replace Christine Giorgetti with:
Christine Giorgetti France
T. Koide Japan
S. L. Hulbert United States
A. Munkholm United States
M. Landolt Switzerland
Stephen P. Collins United Kingdom
W. Wilhelm Germany
C. Vettier France
H. Fujiwara Japan
Hirohito Fukutani Japan
H. Ebert relative to Christine Giorgetti France Christine Giorgetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Christine Giorgetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Ebert. The network helps show where H. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together H. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015165
2 2011139
3 2007116
4 1994106
5 1988101
6 198987
7 198884
8 198984
9 199379
10 199662
11 199656
12 200855
13 200852
14 202051
15 200246
16 199142
17 199741
18 199339
19 200834
20 201133

About H. Ebert

H. Ebert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry and Radiation, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (38 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (19 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (16 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (11 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (10 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (10 papers), Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena (6 papers) and Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (804 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (847 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Structural Biology (36 citations) and Radiation (210 citations). H. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include J. Minář, P. Strange, B. L. Györffy, D. Ködderitzsch, Sebastian Wimmer, Gisela Schütz, Joseph M. Braun, A. Vernes, W. M. Temmerman and P. J. Durham. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Solid State Communications, Journal of Physics Condensed Matter and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact