H. E. Saraph

44 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

H. E. Saraph
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Radiation 292
  • Mechanics of Materials 494
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 316
  • Spectroscopy 239
Replace H. Nussbaumer with:
H. Nussbaumer Switzerland
G. Peach United Kingdom
H. van Regemorter France
W D Robb United States
K. B. MacAdam United States
S. O. Kastner United States
S. S. Tayal United States
B M McLaughlin United States
Constantine E. Theodosiou United States
V M Burke United Kingdom
H. E. Saraph relative to H. Nussbaumer Switzerland H. Nussbaumer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
H. Nussbaumer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Saraph

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Saraph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Saraph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Saraph more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Saraph

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Saraph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Saraph. The network helps show where H. E. Saraph may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. E. Saraph, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. E. Saraph Line = papers co-authored together H. E. Saraph links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978191
2 1972152
3
Atomic data from the IRON project. I. Goals and methods.
1993134
4 1988129
5 196986
6 197773
7 199258
8 198942
9 196938
10 196438
11 196634
12 197032
13 199926
14 197126
15 198026
16 197022
17 197321
18 197621
19 196918
20 198716

About H. E. Saraph

H. E. Saraph is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Radiation, Spectroscopy and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (34 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (18 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (11 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (11 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (4 papers) and Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Radiation (292 citations), Mechanics of Materials (494 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (316 citations) and Spectroscopy (239 citations). H. E. Saraph has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Seaton, Anil K. Pradhan, W. Eissner, G. Peach, P. J. Storey, K A Berrington, J. A. Tully, D. G. Hummer, L. VoKy and H. Nussbaumer. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Physics Communications, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics, Physical Review A and Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact