H Daday
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Plant Science top 5%
- Cassava research and cyanide
- Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Papers in
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 7
- Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms 2
-
- Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology 7
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 3
- Co-authors
- A. Grassia (3 shared papers)E. H. Creaser (1 shared paper)M. I. Whitecross (3 shared papers)F. H. W. Morley (1 shared paper)Denis C. Shaw (1 shared paper)J. V. Possingham (1 shared paper)R. I. Forrester (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Heredity (6 papers)Theoretical and Applied Genetics (3 papers)Nature (3 papers)Plant Cell Reports (1 paper)Grass and Forage Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H Daday
25 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Agronomy and Crop Science 130
- Plant Science 411
- Forestry 38
- Insect Science 81
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 72
Countries citing papers authored by H Daday
This map shows the geographic impact of H Daday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H Daday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H Daday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H Daday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H Daday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H Daday. The network helps show where H Daday may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside H Daday, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 128 | |
| 2 | 1954 | 120 | |
| 3 | 1954 | 109 | |
| 4 | 1958 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1957 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1960 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1973 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1955 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1962 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1960 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1954 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1965 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1974 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1957 | 4 |
About H Daday
H Daday is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (7 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (7 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (5 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (4 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (4 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (3 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers) and Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (130 citations), Plant Science (411 citations), Forestry (38 citations), Insect Science (81 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (72 citations). H Daday has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. Grassia, E. H. Creaser, M. I. Whitecross, F. H. W. Morley, Denis C. Shaw, J. V. Possingham and R. I. Forrester. Their work appears in journals such as Heredity, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Nature, Plant Cell Reports and Grass and Forage Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.