H. C. Coppel

2.1k citations
103 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

H. C. Coppel

100 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

H. C. Coppel
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Insect Science 1.1k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 792
  • Genetics 617
  • Ecology 425
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 134
Replace Gerald N. Lanier with:
Gerald N. Lanier United States
Jan Löfqvist Sweden
J. P. Vité Germany
J. A. Rudinský United States
Charles C. Doane United States
G. Benz Switzerland
Jan Tengö Sweden
Pritam Singh India
Maria Eisner United States
Tetsuya Yasuda Japan
H. C. Coppel relative to Gerald N. Lanier United States Gerald N. Lanier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Gerald N. Lanier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. C. Coppel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. C. Coppel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. C. Coppel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. C. Coppel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. C. Coppel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. C. Coppel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. C. Coppel. The network helps show where H. C. Coppel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. C. Coppel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. C. Coppel Line = papers co-authored together H. C. Coppel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973151
2 197799
3 196883
4 197678
5 196549
6 197642
7 196041
8 196934
9 196934
10
A review of the biological control attempts against insects and weeds in Canada.
196234
11 197932
12 198430
13 197824
14 197924
15 196724
16 195923
17 196323
18 198322
19 198221
20 198721

About H. C. Coppel

H. C. Coppel is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (52 papers), Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (23 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (23 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (18 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (14 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (792 citations), Genetics (617 citations), Ecology (425 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (134 citations). H. C. Coppel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Fumio Matsumura, James W. Mertins, Akira Tai, John A. Breznak, Winston J. Brill, Richard V. Smythe, Douglas M. Jewett, D. M. Benjamin, John E. Casida and W.C. Dauterman. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of the Entomological Society of America, Journal of Chemical Ecology, Journal of Economic Entomology, Canadian Journal of Zoology and Environmental Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact