H. Amory

65 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

H. Amory
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Equine 359
  • Small Animals 120
  • Rehabilitation 107
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 125
  • Animal Science and Zoology 113
Replace Hélène Amory with:
Hélène Amory Belgium
Eduard Jose‐Cunilleras Spain
Erica C. McKenzie United States
E Deegen Germany
Charlotte Sandersen Belgium
Anna M. Firshman United States
Jennifer M. MacLeay United States
Cathérine Delesalle Belgium
Rick M. Arthur United States
Dominique Votion Belgium
H. Amory relative to Hélène Amory Belgium Hélène Amory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hélène Amory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. Amory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Amory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Amory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Amory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Amory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Amory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Amory. The network helps show where H. Amory may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. Amory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. Amory Line = papers co-authored together H. Amory links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199659
2 200755
3 200741
4 201335
5 201035
6 201534
7 199027
8 201326
9 199126
10 200825
11 201123
12 199323
13 200419
14 199019
15 198919
16 201418
17 201018
18 199016
19 199115
20 199414

About H. Amory

H. Amory is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Equine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Animal Science and Zoology and Surgery, having authored 66 papers that have together received 829 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (23 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (14 papers), Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (12 papers), Sports Performance and Training (7 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (6 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (5 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (359 citations), Small Animals (120 citations), Rehabilitation (107 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (125 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (113 citations). H. Amory has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Lekeux, Tatiana Art, Annick Lindén, Daniël Desmecht, Charlotte Sandersen, Daniel Desmecht, Catherine Delguste, F. Rollin, Dominique Votion and Aurélia Leroux. Their work appears in journals such as Equine Veterinary Journal, Veterinary Record, Research in Veterinary Science, Veterinary Research Communications and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact