H. A. Borges

1.8k citations
68 papers · 1.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

H. A. Borges

66 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

H. A. Borges
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Condensed Matter Physics 826
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 639
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 355
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 399
  • Geophysics 194
Replace D. Di Gioacchino with:
D. Di Gioacchino Italy
R. O. Mueller United States
M. Schäfer Germany
H. H. Otto Germany
A. Kolomiets Czechia
R.S. Eccleston United Kingdom
R.E. Rapp Brazil
L. C. Hebel United States
B. Grenier France
May Chiao United States
H. A. Borges relative to D. Di Gioacchino Italy D. Di Gioacchino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
D. Di Gioacchino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. A. Borges

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. A. Borges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. A. Borges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. A. Borges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. A. Borges

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. A. Borges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. A. Borges. The network helps show where H. A. Borges may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H. A. Borges, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. A. Borges Line = papers co-authored together H. A. Borges links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198679
2 200379
3 199967
4
Friedmann cosmology with decaying vacuum density
200566
5 199158
6 200455
7 200455
8 198752
9 199847
10 200643
11 199442
12 201941
13 200537
14 200837
15 199935
16 201235
17 199727
18 199627
19 198826
20 202125

About H. A. Borges

H. A. Borges is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (23 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (20 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (19 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (19 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (16 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (15 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11 papers) and Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (826 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (639 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (355 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (399 citations) and Geophysics (194 citations). H. A. Borges has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include S. Carneiro, J. D. Thompson, M. A. Contínentino, C. Pigozzo, J. S. Alcaniz, J. C. Fabris, J.C.S. Fernandes, R. B. Guimarães, P. G. Pagliuso and R. D. Parks. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physica B Condensed Matter, Physical Review B, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact