Guy T. Smith

758 citations
31 papers · 789 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Guy T. Smith

28 papers receiving 710 citations

Peers

Guy T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Ophthalmology 524
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 142
  • Physiology 71
  • Human-Computer Interaction 19
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 50
Replace Julius T. Oatts with:
Julius T. Oatts United States
Shiri Shulman Israel
Joanna Wasielica‐Poslednik Germany
Guillermo Rocha Canada
Sirel Gür Güngör Türkiye
Alfred T.S. Leung Hong Kong
Rainer Guthoff Germany
Norlina Mohd Ramli Malaysia
Peter Heyworth United Kingdom
Jens Heichel Germany
Guy T. Smith relative to Julius T. Oatts United States Julius T. Oatts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.1×
Julius T. Oatts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guy T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guy T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guy T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy T. Smith. The network helps show where Guy T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guy T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guy T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Guy T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004158
2 2006136
3 201085
4 200666
5 200152
6 199038
7 200338
8 202437
9 200527
10 200024
11 201218
12 200317
13 199916
14 199014
15 200011
16 200611
17 19897
18 19996
19 20206
20 20045

About Guy T. Smith

Guy T. Smith is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 31 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions (3 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (3 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (524 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (142 citations), Physiology (71 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (19 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (50 citations). Guy T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Julian D. Stevens, Edmondo Borasio, Richard M. Sheard, David L. Cooke, David Goldmeier, Clive S. Migdal, Ian Murdoch, Christopher Liu, James Kirwan and Catey Bunce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Eye, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Lara D. Veeken and Cornea.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact