C.C. Hull

961 citations
44 papers · 775 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

C.C. Hull

39 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

C.C. Hull
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ophthalmology 328
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 290
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 26
  • General Dentistry 1
  • Social Psychology 49
Replace Torsten Schlote with:
Torsten Schlote Germany
Piotr Kanclerz Poland
Jay C. Bradley United States
Pavan K. Verkicharla India
J. Willem L. Tideman Netherlands
Luuk Franssen Netherlands
Martin Emesz Austria
William Trattler United States
Aoi Komuro Japan
Byki Huntjens United Kingdom
C.C. Hull relative to Torsten Schlote Germany Torsten Schlote's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Torsten Schlote · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C.C. Hull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.C. Hull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.C. Hull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.C. Hull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.C. Hull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.C. Hull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.C. Hull. The network helps show where C.C. Hull may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.C. Hull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C.C. Hull Line = papers co-authored together C.C. Hull links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010167
2 2017123
3 2005118
4 200892
5 202027
6 199526
7 201923
8 202322
9 200021
10 199919
11 199916
12 200315
13 201915
14 199612
15 20009
16 20198
17 20076
18 20146
19 20206
20 19955

About C.C. Hull

C.C. Hull is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 44 papers that have together received 775 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (14 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (6 papers), Advanced optical system design (6 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (4 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (328 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (290 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (26 citations), General Dentistry (1 citation) and Social Psychology (49 citations). C.C. Hull has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John G Lawrenson, Laura Elizabeth Downie, Christopher Liu, John Albert Marshall, Miles R. Stanford, Lucia Pelosini, James F Boyce, D. McHugh, Radhika Tandon and David P.S. O'Brart. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact