Grid Thoma

17 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Grid Thoma
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 205
  • Strategy and Management 101
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 46
  • Accounting 38
  • Economics and Econometrics 53
Replace Byung‐Keun Kim with:
Byung‐Keun Kim South Korea
Rajat Khanna United States
Puay Khoon Toh United States
Susanne Thorwarth Germany
Satyasiba Das India
Jong‐Rong Chen Taiwan
Khalil Nimer Kuwait
Thomas Maximilian Klueter Spain
Cristiane Chaves Gattaz Brazil
Jingbei Wang China
Grid Thoma relative to Byung‐Keun Kim South Korea Byung‐Keun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.7×
Byung‐Keun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Grid Thoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Grid Thoma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Grid Thoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Grid Thoma more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Grid Thoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Grid Thoma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Grid Thoma. The network helps show where Grid Thoma may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Grid Thoma, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Grid Thoma Line = papers co-authored together Grid Thoma links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2007119
2 201371
3 200843
4 201439
5 201238
6 200931
7 201924
8 201514
9 20099
10 20199
11 20147
12
Scientific and technological regimes in nanotechnology. Combinatorial inventors and performance
20054
13 20214
14
Economic Value and Quality of Chinese Patenting: an International Perspective
20121
15 20161
16 20211
17 20231
18
Patent Management and Valuation. The Strategic and Geographical Dimension
20160
19 20240

About Grid Thoma

Grid Thoma is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Law, Economics and Econometrics and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 19 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intellectual Property and Patents (16 papers), Intellectual Property Law (2 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (1 paper), International Business and FDI (1 paper), Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (1 paper) and Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (205 citations), Strategy and Management (101 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (46 citations), Accounting (38 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (53 citations). Grid Thoma has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrea J. Bonaccorsi, Karin Hoisl C, Stefan Wagner, Costanza Torricelli, Salvatore Torrisi, Bronwyn H. Hall, Dietmar Harhoff and Stine Grodal. Their work appears in journals such as World Patent Information, Research Policy, Quarterly Journal of Finance, European Management Review and Industry and Innovation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact